(If you would like
to receive Pastor Harris’ weekly sermons via e-mail,
Pastor Scott L. Harris
Grace Bible Church, NY
October 24, 2010
Biblical Principles for Voting
I have spoken on this topic before, and perhaps that is why when I finished
my first draft of this sermon it was 25% longer that it is now after cutting it
down. For that reason I have made copies of my earlier sermons available which
will have more detail on the historical background and the Christian’s
responsibility toward government. (See: The Christian & Politics and The Christian & Government) This morning I will cover those briefly while
concentrating on God’s purposes for government, our responsibilities in a
democratic republic, and Biblical principles to follow in deciding how to vote.
Let me begin with some brief historical background. First, the impression you
get from the mainstream media is that Christians who actually live for Christ
are unqualified for office because they have “religious values,” and the
advocation of those values would be a violation of the “separation of church
and state” clause. There is not any “separation of church and state”
clause anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or its amendments. In fact, at one time
many states required those running for office to be members of a church. Our
current legal precedent traces back to an erroneous and perverted U.S. Supreme
court decision in 1947, Everson vs. Board of Education, which began the
process of turning the First Amendment on its head.
Second, a church is tax exempt by virtue of being church and actually does
not need to have 501(c)(3) status. No church has yet lost its tax status for
political involvement, so do not fear that my sermon today is somehow illegal or
will jeopardize our tax exempt status.
Third, politics is simply the art and science of public affairs and the
government of a state, and a politician is simply a person who is involved in
politics. Tragically, so many politicians have sought personal gain instead of
societal good that the words have developed very negative connotations. As easy
as it is to deride and make fun of politicians, we should be careful not to
group all politicians as being the same. There are many who have high integrity
and do strive to be public servants.
The Christian & Government
Christians are often surprised to find out that the Bible has great
toleration for many types of governmental systems including patriarchal
(Abraham), tribal (early Israel), theocratic (Joshua through the judges),
kingdoms (Saul, Caesar, etc.), a representative body (the Sanhedrin) and an
absolute dictatorship (the Millennial kingdom). Much debate occurs about which
type of government is best, but more depends on who is leading it than the type
of system itself. That is why we look forward to the absolute dictatorship of
Jesus Christ in the Millennium, but would fear any other human dictator.
We begin by understanding that God is the foundation of all government
regardless of the type, for He establishes or removes those in positions of
power. King Nebuchadnezzar found this out the hard way in Daniel 4. God judged
him for his pride and after seven years of living in the fields like an animal,
God gave back his reason and Nebuchadnezzar then blessed and praised the Most
High saying, “For His dominion is an everlasting dominion, And His kingdom
[endures] from generation to generation. 35 “And all the inhabitants of the
earth are accounted as nothing, But He does according to His will in the host of
heaven And [among] the inhabitants of earth; And no one can ward off His hand Or
say to Him, ‘What hast Thou done?’” (Daniel 4:34-35).
The ramifications of this for democratic republics include: 1) Those holding
an office need to be humble. God put you into office and He can take you out in
a variety of ways. 2) Those running for office need to be more concerned about
pleasing God than pleasing people. 3) Christians can be at peace regardless of
who is in office, good or bad, because we know that God is ultimately in control
and will accomplish His will.
Paul states in Romans 13:1-2, “Let every person be in subjection to the
governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those
which exist are established by God. 2 Therefore he who resists authority has
opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive
condemnation upon themselves. Since the origin of governmental authority is
from God, Christians should submit to the government as long as doing so does
not require them to disobey God. Christians should be the models of good
citizenship, but our first allegiance is always to God,
but that fact will be the reason that some governments will persecute Christians
(See Daniel 3).
Paul continues on in Romans 13:3-4 to explain the twofold purpose God has
established for human government. “For rulers are not a cause of fear for
good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what
is good, and you will have praise from the same; 4 for it is a minister of God
to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the
sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon
the one who practices evil.
The first purpose of government is to promote what is good. Roman rule could
be oppressive and cruel, yet for the most part, Roman rule brought stability and
security for those that did what was good. A government that causes those who do
good to fear are in direct violation of its God given purpose and are in danger
of God’s judgement against them. The prophet Isaiah warned ancient Judah about
this saying, “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute
darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet, and
sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20). If God will judge
His chosen people for this failure, then all other nations also need to take
The second purpose of government stated here is to be a cause of fear to
those who do evil because they bear the sword as an avenger who brings wrath
upon those who do evil. The “sword” represents the authority of the ruler to
punish evil doers even to the extreme of the death penalty. What is true for the
most severe penalty is also true for lesser penalties.
Notice that verse 4 specifically says that the ruler is “a minister of God
to you for good.” We don’t often think of government officials in that
light, but it is true nevertheless. All government officials are ministers of
God in this respect, regardless of their own personal beliefs. Why is that an
important point? Because every government authority will have to give an account
of their stewardship of office to God. What King Jehoshaphat said to the judges
he appointed still applies today. “Consider what you are doing, for you do
not judge for man but for the Lord who is with you when you render judgment.
“Now then let the fear of the Lord be upon you; be very careful what you do, for
the Lord our God will have no part in unrighteousness, or partiality, or the
taking of a bribe” (2 Chron. 19:6,7).
If a government will not fulfill its God given duties, then He may chastize
it or replace it with another as He has done many times in the past. Chastening
may come through natural disasters or oppression by other nations such as
happened to Egypt (Exodus 7-11) or to Israel during the
period of the Judges and Kings. He can replace a government by striking down the
ruler supernaturally or with a disease (such as Herod – Acts
12:21-24). He may have it overthrown by an internal rebellion
(1 Kings 12, 22, etc) or by having another nation conquer
it (2 Kings 17, 25).
Responsibility to Government
Paul went on to explain in Romans 13:5-8 our responsibility to Government.
“5 Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but
also for conscience’ sake.” 6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for
[rulers] are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing. 7 Render
to all what is due them: tax to whom tax [is due;] custom to whom custom; fear
to whom fear; honor to whom honor.”
First, we are to be in subjection to it out of both fear and conscience.
While we do not want the negative consequences of breaking the law, more
important for Christians is having a blameless conscience before God and man.
That was one of Paul’s goals (Acts 24:16), and Peter said
this would silence and put to shame those that would slander us
(1 Peter 2:13-17).
Second, we pay our taxes. Even Jesus paid them though He could have claimed
exemption as the Son of God (Matt. 17:25-27), and He said
to “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that
are God’s” (Matthew 22:17-21). While we should work
toward making sure taxes are fair and used properly, we still pay them and do
not cheat even when they are corrupt and used wrongly because that would bring
consequences upon ourselves and shame upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
We are also to render proper respect to the authorities – “fear” and “honor.”
This includes following proper decorum and protocol such as proper courtesies,
speech and respectful gestures in all situations, and appropriate clothing in
Christians and Politics in a Democracy
In a democracy citizens have a direct function in government and therefore
responsibilities and privileges. We have a responsibility to help select our
representatives and the privilege of addressing them and petitioning the
government with our concerns and grievances. How then do these Biblical
principles apply when we consider who to vote for and the issues that should be
of the most concern to us?
Priorities: Over the last 22 years, economic issues have dominated the
political landscape, but they are not to be our first priorities, for taxes and
the economic systems are not specific Biblical concerns. While there are many
Biblical principles to guide economic systems, we must determine our priorities
by issues on which the Bible gives clear commands. Our top political priorities
are the moral issues since government has a twofold purpose of promoting what is
good and punishing those who do evil. And we must remember that it is God, not
society or any human institution that determines what is good or evil which He
does for us in the commands, principles and precepts of His word, the Bible.
For example, a just judicial system (Deuteronomy 16:19-20)
and execution of murderers (Genesis 9:5-6) is more
important than tax rates on businesses or individuals. God will provide for
those that seek first His kingdom and righteousness regardless of tax rates
(Matthew 6:33), but His judgment abides on those who
pervert justice (Isaiah 10). Moral issues such as
protection, justice and moral integrity are higher priorities than economic
Responsibilities: While God sovereignly sets in office the individual
of His choice, either as a blessing or a curse, our responsibility in a
democratic republic is two fold. First, because the government representatives
are chosen by the people we must be serious about voting and then vote for the
candidate that would best reflect godliness in his position on the issues and
personal character. Second, we must stand in opposition to governmental
representatives, officials and policies when they are contrary to the clear
teachings of God’s word.
First, as citizens of a democratic republic we have a responsibility to
choose and influence our governmental representatives. In a real sense, our
government and its decisions are reflections of the people and so we as a people
bear the responsibility for it. If the government officials are corrupt and
evil, they were elected by the people and so the people are getting what they
deserve. However, as Christians, we also have the responsibility to see God’s
standards upheld and are to work hard to have such evil and corrupt officials
replaced by godly ones – perhaps even yourself. The establishment of a godly
government is a blessing on all people. Even Proverbs 29:2 tells us, “When
the righteous increase, the people rejoice, But when a wicked man rules, people
While we must be serious about our responsibilities in electing and
influencing government, we must also be very careful not to fall into the trap
of substituting the quest for a godly human government as a quest for the
kingdom of God. There are theologies that teach that man will bring about God’s
kingdom on earth through establishment of proper human government. That is
simply not true. Even a cursory examination of the book of Revelation or
consideration of Jesus’ words in Matthew 24 tell us things will get a lot worse
before the Lord returns to establish His kingdom.
Second, we must stand in opposition to people and policies that are contrary
to the clear teachings of God’s word. It is wrong to take God’s sovereignty in
some divine mystical sense by which it is thought that God approves of whoever
got elected and that we are therefore to submit without opposition. Not only
does that mindset have the danger of resulting in fatalism, but it is contrary
to the Biblical examples. First, the prophets did not follow that example even
when the King was specifically chosen by God. Nathan directly confronted David
about his sin in 2 Samuel 7. Samuel confronted King Saul because he did not
carry out the commands of God and so was rejected from being king
(1 Samuel 15). John the Baptist called King Herod to account publically
because Herod violated God’s moral law by taking his brother’s wife
(Mark 6). Jeremiah rebuked the king because he was
violating the purpose of government in being unjust and oppressing the stranger,
the orphan, and widows instead of protecting them (Jeremiah 22).
The fact that neither Jesus nor any of the apostles advocated the overthrow of
the Roman government does not abrogate the responsibility to oppose ungodliness
in government. Jesus pronounced plenty of woes upon the Scribes and Pharisees,
many of whom were in the Sanhedrin, a governing body. In John 19:11 Jesus
pointed out the guilt of those who had delivered Him to Pilate, but he still
held Pilate responsible for his judgment. In the future, Jesus will overthrow
all human governments to set up His millennial kingdom
(Revelation 19). When God’s moral laws are transgressed and His purposes
for government are not fulfilled, it is not only right, but necessary to speak
against those things.
Evaluating the Candidates and the Issues
Since political candidates will be a mixture of various moral standards, it
may be rare to find a candidate that rates well on everything. Some candidates
and issues will be choices between bad and worse, but there are issues that are
downright evil that must to be opposed. Let me quickly go over some of the major
issues and give you some questions that should be in your mind as you evaluate
the issues and any candidate for any office.
1) Life: The first moral priority is human life. God is the creator of
life and all human life is made in His image, so all human life has inherent
worth (Genesis 1:26,27), which is why God prohibited
murder of human life and required capital punishment for those that do
(Genesis 9:6). Other punishments were given for those that
accidentally killed a human (Numbers 35). The innocent
blood of those murdered cried out for justice and that was one reason for the
destruction of Judah (2 Kings. 24:2). The Bible is also
clear that human life begins in the womb. God formed you in your mother’s womb
(Psalm 139:13). God said He knew and consecrated Jeremiah
while he was in his mother’s womb (Jeremiah 1:5,6). John
the Baptist recognized the presence of Jesus and leaped for joy while both were
still in their mothers’ wombs (Luke 1:41-44). To kill a
baby in the womb is to destroy the work of God and attack His image. Abortion is
murder of a human being just as is infanticide and euthanasia. Yet, there are
candidates that advocate all those things as acceptable. After the overthrow our
abortion laws by Roe vs Wade in 1973 it was not until the Born Alive Infant
Protection act in 2002 that infants born after a failed abortion were protected
from being murdered outside of the womb. Oregon and Washington have already
passed laws legalizing euthanasia.
Here are some questions to consider: What value does the candidate put on
human life? What protections does he advocate to protect human life? Is the
candidate pro-life, indifferent or pro-abortion? Those who call themselves
“pro-choice” are either indifferent or pro-abortion and are usually liars since
they rarely support informed consent and waiting period laws. Those that will
not protect the life of the most innocent and helpless among us, a baby in the
womb, cannot be trusted to protect anything else except their own interests.
What is the candidate’s position on euthanasia? Do they uphold capital
punishment for those convicted of murder?
2) Protection: Protection encompasses both internal and external
threats. A police force and local militia protect against local threats while
armed forces protect against threats from other nations. While armed forces can
be used by evil men for evil purposes, that very fact proves the necessity of
having armed forces to protect against those who would do us evil. The founding
fathers of the United States understood this and that is why the U.S.
Constitution enumerated the need of an army, navy and militia to suppress
insurrections and repel invasions (Article 1, Section 8)
and the role of the President as the Commander in Chief (Article
2, Section 2).
Questions to consider: Does the candidate understand the protective role of
government both locally and nationally and advocate law and order? Police should
be supported in their protective role while being restricted from becoming
oppressors themselves. Does the candidate understand the necessity and proper
use of armed forces as well as diplomacy in averting war
(Proverbs 20:18; Luke 14:31)? We should strive to avoid war when
possible, but when we can’t, there must be the ability to wage it with clear
purpose and objectives.
3) Justice: Government has the responsibility to establish and execute
justice, and to the degree a government deviates from God’s standards of justice
is the degree to which it is failing. Tragically, the United States is failing
in many ways to carry out justice due to political corruption by which laws are
ignored or changed to benefit the politically favored class. We also have judges
that rule based on what they would like it to be rather than what the law
Let me quickly point out that so called “social justice” is not Biblical
justice whenever it is an effort to bring about an equality of an outcome. God
has not gifted all people equally so equality of outcome is impossible without
forcibly taking from some to give to others. The word for that is stealing. True
social justice is an equality of opportunity or fairness in the application of
the law – not an equality of outcome.
Justice must also be carried out with the right attitude. Micah 6:8
succinctly states, “He has told you, O man, what is good; And what does the
Lord require of you But to do justice, to love kindness (or mercy), And
to walk humbly with your God? This statement encompasses what you do, what
you desire and what you are. It is humility in walking with God that brings
about the proper kindness and mercy that temper justice. We are to be merciful
because we have received mercy from God (Matthew 5:7; 18:21-35).
However, mercy without justice is injustice and an abandonment of the protective
role of government.
Questions to consider: Does the candidate uphold the rule of law? Does he
advocate interpretation of law according to what is written and original intent?
Is his advocation or opposition to a law based on Biblical standards or
something else? Is the candidate fair in their dealings with both supporters and
opponents? Is the candidate subject to political corruption by influences either
in or outside of government?
4) Morality: Isaiah 5:20 pronounces a woe upon those “who call evil
good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness.”
Tragically, there are now many in our society that do just that. God clearly
describes what is good and what is evil in the Bible, but He also pronounces
some things as abhorrent and abominations. There are some things that are
especially evil which should receive a priority in a government’s protective
efforts and application of justice. Some of these things reveal an evil
character even when the outward presentation looks good. The Old Testament word
for abomination (toebah) is usually used in reference to idolatry and improper
worship of God, however, there are also societal actions that are also described
Leviticus 18 lists immoral sexual practices including homosexuality, incest,
fornication, adultery and bestiality alongside child sacrifice as abominations
which defiled the land. The penalty for most of them was death. Abortions are
this nation’s child sacrifices to feminism. Many political leaders now advocate
sexual immorality and perversions. The family should be the first social unit of
protection, but incest turns it into the first opportunity to prey on the
weaker. Adultery destroys the trust that is foundational for marriage and thus
destroys families, and both it and fornication spread a host of diseases that
can hinder or destroy health and leave women infertile. Bestiality and
homosexual practices introduce and spread even more diseases some of which kill.
Mortality rates for homosexuals are under 50 while the rates for the general
population is in the 70’s and 80’s. Simple compassion should compel us to strive
to stop these practices for the protection of society and the individuals doing
them, yet many candidates pride themselves in advocating not just tolerance, but
acceptance and societal equality for these things.
Questions to consider concerning sexual morality. Does the candidate seek to
protect marriage or make it easier to get a divorce (which usually exploits the
woman with children)? Do they uphold the sacredness of marriage between a man
and a woman or advocate redefining it according to the homosexual agenda? Do
they uphold laws against sexual immorality, or do they advocate forcing society
to accept as a specially protected class the sexually perverse including
homosexuals, cross dressers and trans-gendered?
Personal Integrity. Proverbs 6:16-19 is helpful in understanding God’s
assessment of people and therefore helpful in evaluating a political candidate’s
personal integrity. “There are six things which the Lord hates, Yes, seven
which are an abomination to Him: 17 Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, And hands that
shed innocent blood, 18 A heart that devises wicked plans, Feet that run rapidly
to evil, 19 A false witness [who] utters lies, And one who spreads strife among
Haughty eyes refer to that condescending look the proud can give because they
think themselves to be superior to the rest of us mere knaves. This is a common
attitude among the political elite. Beware of proud and arrogant candidates that
think they know what is best for you and want government control over your life.
Is the candidate proud or humble?
A lying tongue reveals a dishonest and selfish character striving to do what
is best for themselves instead of what is best for others. It seems many
politicians strive to make lying an art form, but a person that is characterized
by lying cannot be trusted on anything. The Bible gives strong warning against
it including that those who practice it will be cast into the lake of fire
instead of going to heaven (Leviticus 19:11; Proverbs 12:22;
Colossians 3:9; Revelation 21:8). All candidates will fail at some point,
but more is revealed about their integrity by whether they are honest about it
or not than in the particular failure itself. Is the candidate characterized by
honesty or lying?
The individual does not have to be the one who physically sheds innocent
blood. Accomplices are also guilty and that includes those who allowed it to
happen because they either advocated the laws permitting it or were complacent
in their duties to prevent it. Again, what is the candidate’s position on
abortion, infanticide and euthanasia as well as their positions on law
enforcement, military and justice.
A heart that devises wicked plans will be revealed by what the candidate
advocates. Does the candidate’s vision for the future and goals for the present
line up better with what God would want or Satan? Do they promote what is moral
and godly and strive to restrict what is evil, or do they call good evil and
Feet that run rapidly to evil describe the feeding frenzy of sharks that
strive to get whatever they can when someone has fallen victim to another. They
may join in the evil themselves or just watch it with glee. They see another
person’s downfall as an opportunity for gain for themselves. They broadcast the
shame of another instead of trying to correct and heal it. What is the
candidate’s response to the evil that befalls others? Intervene? Watch? Join in?
A false witness is worse than the general liar because his lies make someone
else his victim. It is bad enough to lie about yourself so others will think you
are something you are not or can do something you can’t, but it is a lot worse
to try to destroy another person with lies. That includes spreading gossip or
having others do that in his stead. This has become common political practice.
Does the candidate lie about others? Verify content of political attack ads.
The final abomination in this list is spreading strife among brothers.
Relationships that should be close and harmonious, or at least cooperative, are
strained or even destroyed by the actions of an antagonist. They can generate
the strife themselves or just take advantage of a rift or strain already present
and make it wider through lies, gossip, rumor and innuendo. This is such a
problem in New York State government that it is dysfunctional though the same
party controls both the legislative and executive branches. Is the candidate
known for antagonism or graciousness?
When these various abominations are combined, we have the politics of
personal destruction. An evil, but effective tactic, used by wicked people to
gain political power.
Let me quickly add here that having solid convictions and firm positions does
not mean you have to be obstinate. The truth can and should be spoken in love.
Even strong rebukes can be given with a sense of caring. A position can be
stated firmly without joining in the rants and rage of the opposition. Is the
candidate able to hold firmly to his convictions and still be gracious and have
a spirit of cooperation?
There are many other issues Biblical issues, such as stealing and graft, that
could also be addressed and should be applied to politics. This sermon was only
to prod you to start thinking according to Biblical values and priorities
instead of political ones when voting, running for public office or serving in
one. Moral character and personal integrity are much more important than any set
of proclaimed policies and promises. You will never find a candidate that agrees
with you 100% on every issue, but we are to evaluate carefully and make the best
vote we can.
As Christians, our first priority is always to please our Lord and trust Him
to bring good out of any situation even when they are not to our liking and are
antagonistic to His stated moral will (Romans 8:28; James 1:2-4).
While we want our candidate to win and may work hard to achieve that, our
primary goal is to please the Lord, not be on the winning side. If running for
office, your primary goal is to please the Lord, not win the election. If in
public office, your primary goal is to please to the Lord, not win re-election
or please the people. Our goal is to one day stand before our Lord and hear Him
say to us, “Well done thou good and faithful servant.”
Sermon Notes – 10/24/2010
A Biblical Criteria for Voting – Selected Scriptures
The “separation of church and state” clause is
____anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or its amendments
Churches are tax _________ by virtue of being a church –
not a 503 (c)(3) organization
Politics and Politicians were not always words with
The Christian & Government
The Bible has great tolerance for ________________ of
It is God that establishes or removes those in positions
of ____________ – Daniel 4
Those in office should be _________. God put you in office
and can easily _____________ you.
Those running for office need to be more concerned about
pleasing the __________ than people
Believers have __________ regardless of who is in office
and how good or bad they may be
Romans 13:1-2. Christians ________to government as long as
it does not require disobedience to God
Government’s Twofold Purpose – Romans 13:3-4.
Government should promote what is _____________
Governments that cause those who do good to fear risk
being ______________ (Isaiah 5:20)
Government must cause fear to those who do _________
because they carry the sword as an avenger
Government officials are “a ____________ of God to you
for good” (Romans 13:4)
They will give an _____________ of their stewardship of
office to God (2 Chronicles 19:6,7)
God has chastised or replaced governments that do not
fulfill their ___________ given duties
Responsibility to Government – Romans 13:5-8
We are to be in subjection to government out of both fear
We are to pay our __________ whether we like them or not
We are to render proper ___________ to the authorities
Christians and Politics in a Democracy
We have a responsibility to help ____________ our
We have the privilege of addressing & petitioning
government with our ____________ and grievances.
Priorities: ____________ issues now dominate the political landscape
Our political priorities are to be the ___________ issues
– God defines what is good and what is evil
Responsibilities: First, we must be ____________ about voting, the
people get what they choose
We have a responsibility to see God’s ______________
upheld and seek a godly government
We must not substitute the quest for a godly ___________
government as a quest for the kingdom of God
Second, we oppose people and policies that are ___________
to the clear teachings of God’s word
Evaluating the Candidates and the Issues
Abortion, infanticide and euthanasia are all ___________.
Questions: What value does the candidate put on human life? Are they
pro-life, indifferent or pro-abortion? What is their position on euthanasia?
Do they uphold capital punishment for murder?
2) Protection of its people against internal and external threats is a
__________purpose of government
Questions: Does the candidate understand the protective role of
government both locally and nationally? Does he understand the necessity and
proper use of armed force as well as diplomacy
3) Justice: To the degree a government deviates from God’s standard of
justice, it ___________
True social justice is equality of opportunity or fairness
in the application of law, not equal outcome
Micah 6:8 – Justice is to be tempered by mercy. Mercy
without justice is injustice.
Questions: Does the candidate uphold the rule of law? Is he fair in his
dealings with supporters and opponents? Is the candidate subject to political
corruption either in or outside of government?
4) Morality – Isaiah 5:20 – woe to those who call evil good, and good
Some things are especially evil and God pronounces them as
abhorrent and ______________
Leviticus ______ – immoral sexual practices and
perversions and child sacrifice
Sexual perversions ____________ families and spread
diseases, some of which are deadly
Questions: Does the candidate seek to protect marriage or make it
easier to get a divorce? Do they uphold the sacredness of marriage between a
man or a woman or advocate redefining marriage and the family? Doe they uphold
laws against sexual perversions or do they advocate forcing to accept them.
5) Personal integrity: Proverbs 6:16-19. Seven things that are
abominations to the Lord.
Haughty eyes – The condescending look of the
_______& arrogant. Is the candidate proud or humble?
A lying tongue – Liars cannot be __________. Is the
candidate characterized by honesty or lying?
Shed innocent blood – _______________ advocate laws
allowing it or are complacent in preventing it.
What is the candidate’s position
on abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, law enforcement, justice?
A heart that devises wicked plans – Do the
candidate’s policies _________God’s or Satan’s standards?
Feet that run rapidly to evil – What is their
___________ to evil? Intervene? Watch ? or Join in?
A false witness – done to ___________ the other
person. Does the candidate lie / slander others
Spread strife among brothers – either generate it
or perpetuate it by lies, __________ and innuendo
Is the candidate known for
antagonism or graciousness and cooperation?
Conclusions – Strive to approach politics according to _______values and
priorities instead of political ones Our first priority is always to be pleasing
to our ________& trust Him whether voting, running or serving
Young Children – draw a picture
about something you hear during the sermon. Explain your picture(s) to your
parents at lunch. Older Children – Do one or more of the following: 1)
Count how many times the word “candidate” is said. 2) Discuss with your parents
how to apply Biblical principles when voting.
For comments, please e-mail